Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1837 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £178.88 vs £533.99
- Up to 59% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900KS - £1.01 vs £2.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 23% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-8700 - 218 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
177
81%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £178.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.45/FPS
41%
Price, £
£533.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |