Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 363 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 27% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3930 - 186 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - £39.99 vs £198.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-8700 - £0.27 vs £1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £198.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
146
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 327 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |