Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 3130 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 13% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-820QM - 248 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
