Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3854 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 25 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 38% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-640LM - 601 vs 435 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 20 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
601
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |