Buy on Amazon
£65.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790 and the cheaper Celeron G1840 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1840 - 261 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i7-4790 - £49.95 vs £65.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-4790 - £0.21 vs £0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i7-4790 - 53 vs 84 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Powerful Intel i7-4790 CPU with 35W TDP - Quad Core
Buy for £65.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12482 minutes ago
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
236
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1840 Processor 2.8 GHz LGA1150 2 MB Cache Boxed CPU
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12481 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-4790
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 84 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
