Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £93.43 vs £325.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-4765T - 500 vs 468 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 20 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for £93.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74516 minutes ago
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
912
54.41527446300716%
Multi-Core
2911
34.547828150961315%
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |