Buy on Amazon
£93.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $303
Availability
MSRP in USD: $303
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1718 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 35 vs 62 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-4765T - 256 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - £86.88 vs £93.43
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Core I7-4765T I7 4765T 2.0 GHz Quad-Core CPU Processor 8M 35W LGA 1150
Buy for £93.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74121 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-8300 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 3.7 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 91W, BX80684I38300
Buy for £86.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
912
70.09992313604918%
Multi-Core
2911
76.10457516339869%
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 62 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
