Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-4710HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2835 days newer than Core i7-4710HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4710HQ - 135 vs 124 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 473 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |