Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4700HQ outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4700HQ is 339 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700HQ
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1840 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 47 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
116
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |