Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-4700HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1536 days newer than Core i7-4700HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700HQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 38% better in League of Legends than Core i7-4700HQ - 154 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700HQ - 24 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
154
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |