Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3768 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-3667U - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
241
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£465.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |