Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i7-3520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3768 days newer than Core i7-3520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3520M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-3520M - 195 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3520M - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£465.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3520M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |