Buy on Amazon
£346
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2788 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 62% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-2860QM - 123 vs 76 FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-9700F Desktop Processor 8 Core Up to 4.7 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W | BX80684I79700F
Buy for £346 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
