Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £258.88 vs £839.38
- Up to 69% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-10900 - £1.4 vs £4.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-9700F - 186 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
185
99%
Value, £/FPS
£1.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£258.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18797 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.51/FPS
31%
Price, £
£839.38
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for £839.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |