Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i7-2720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3211 days newer than Core i7-2720QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2720QM
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-2720QM - 160 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2720QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£599
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2720QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |