Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 1743 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 35% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-9400F - 276 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 28 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - £127.89 vs £379.88
- Up to 55% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-14700K - £0.62 vs £1.38 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
44%
Price, £
£379.88
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for £379.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
205
74%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£127.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £127.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |