Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-12900F - 586 vs 574 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £322.99 vs £346.89
- Up to 5% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-13700K - £0.56 vs £0.59 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
586
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
94%
Price, £
£346.89
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16230 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
574
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£322.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £322.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |