Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-11700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-11700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-11700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-11700F - 134 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £261.16 vs £346.89
- Up to 16% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700K - £2.18 vs £2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.59/FPS
84%
Price, £
£346.89
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11133 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
120
89%
Value, £/FPS
£2.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£261.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £261.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |