Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900 - 134 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £346.89 vs £839.38
- Up to 65% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900 - £2.59 vs £7.49 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7464 minutes ago
Buy for £839.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |