Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 93% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 305 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
305
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£281.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £281.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7919 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |