Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2149 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 48% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 62 vs 42 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |