Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Halo Infinite than Core i3-10105 - 163 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £84.99 vs £217.09
- Up to 61% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i7-10700F - £0.52 vs £1.33 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.33/FPS
39%
Price, £
£217.09
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for £217.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
162
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |