Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2445 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3770K - 177 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - £168.88 vs £225.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3770K - £0.95 vs £1.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
177
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.95/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14700 minutes ago
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |