Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9500F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1361 days older than the more expensive Core i5-9500F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500F
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Core i5-9500F - 716 vs 715 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-9500F - £116.99 vs £234.95
- Up to 52% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-9500F - £0.16 vs £0.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £234.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
716
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£116.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £116.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9500F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |