Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 435 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £165.37 vs £315.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £0.8 vs £1.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-9500 - 210 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500 - 24 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
208
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.8/FPS
100%
Price, £
£165.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £165.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
210
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.5/FPS
53%
Price, £
£315
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |