Buy on Amazon
£128.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $346
Availability
MSRP in USD: $346
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1955 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-4600M - 158 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
158
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9GHz LGA1151 9M Cache BOX CPU
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4471 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i7-4600M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 37 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
