Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2179 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 1000M - 121 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron 1000M |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |