Buy on Amazon
£150.64
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 194 vs 185 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - £99.99 vs £150.64
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 24 vs 6 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-9400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores 2. 90 GHz up to 4. 10 GHz Turbo LGA1151 300 Series 65W Processors BX80684I59400
Buy for £150.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74125 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
95.36082474226805%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£99.99
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-9400
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
84.82658959537572%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
