Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8305G outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8305G is 1927 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8305G
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than FX-8300 - 183 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-8305G
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8305G | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake G | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
