Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8279U outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8279U is 1017 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8279U
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 119 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 28 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
118
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 458 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 3rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8279U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Pro Plus 655 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |