Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1345 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-6350 - 133 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - £49.99 vs £158.88
- Up to 64% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-7600K - £0.43 vs £1.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 6 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |