Buy on Amazon
£76.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G1610 - 181 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - £5.56 vs £76.66
- Up to 93% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-7600 - £0.03 vs £0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-7600
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
7.142857142857142%
Price, £
£76.66
7%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-7600 3.5 GHz QuadCore 6 Mb Cache CPU - Black
Buy for £76.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
178
98.34254143646409%
Value, £/FPS
£0.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.56
100%
Value Winner
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-7600
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
31.02694828841952%
Multi-Core
739
19.386149003147953%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
