Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2103 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 94% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - £5.56 vs £86.0
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1610 - 177 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
47.91901012373454%
Multi-Core
739
39.795368874528805%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |