Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4188 days newer than Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 66% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-760 - 391 vs 236 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
