Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3412 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Remnant II than Core i5-760 - 83 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-760 - £60.0 vs £199.49
- Up to 72% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-760 - £0.72 vs £2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £199.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
83
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.72/FPS
100%
Price, £
£60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Lynnfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |