Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £158.28 vs £213.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-10900KF - £1.25 vs £1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-7500T - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 20 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£158.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £158.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Buy for £213 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |