Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Core i5-480M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4664 days newer than Core i5-480M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 81% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-480M - 784 vs 434 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-480M - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-480M doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
784
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-480M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |