Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £106.66 vs £197.13
- Up to 32% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-11600 - £0.62 vs £0.91 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 26% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-4690 - 216 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
171
79.16666666666666%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£106.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £106.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3717 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
216
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.91/FPS
68.13186813186813%
Price, £
£197.13
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for £197.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3716 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
56.1262959472196%
Multi-Core
3303
40.33952125061065%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |