Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 14% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3570K - 179 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £138.99 vs £236.82
- Up to 33% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11600 - £0.89 vs £1.32 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.32/FPS
67%
Price, £
£236.82
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for £236.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
157
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £138.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |