Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 29% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 167 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 55 vs 84 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£68.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £68.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |