Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £71.18 vs £214.12
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-4670K - 393 vs 343 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74571 minutes ago
Buy for £214.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1255
77.85359801488833%
Multi-Core
3544
49.01120177015627%
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |