Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i5-430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3288 days newer than Core i5-430M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 29% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-430M - 555 vs 429 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-430M - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
555
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-430M | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |