Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2433 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 37 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4300M - 134 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 12 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£137.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £137.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11985 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |