Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £119.95 vs £237.41
- Up to 46% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11600 - £0.88 vs £1.64 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600KF - 145 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
53%
Price, £
£237.41
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for £237.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |