Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2433 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 37 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-4300M - 183 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 8 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |