Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2135 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 37 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 40% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-4300M - 178 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 12 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4300M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
