Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2427 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 8% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-4300M - 238 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 8 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-4300M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
