Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 332 days older than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - 324 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - £49.99 vs £72.72
- Up to 27% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-3570 - £0.16 vs £0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 6 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £72.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |