Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2991 days newer than Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3550S - 125 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£603.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £603.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4310 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
34.87565066512435%
Multi-Core
1698
16.929212362911265%
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |