Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 9% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-10700 - 62 vs 57 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £494.75 vs £603.42
- Up to 11% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £8.68 vs £9.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.73/FPS
89.20863309352517%
Price, £
£603.42
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for £603.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3699 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
57
91.93548387096774%
Value, £/FPS
£8.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£494.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £494.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1581
91.44013880855985%
Multi-Core
7010
69.89032901296112%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |